The revisions let you track differences between multiple versions of a post.
Revision of IPX vs FOX - GA Season 2 Match 7 from Fri, 08/08/2008 - 13:26
10/08/2008 21:00
10/08/2008 23:30
Australia/Sydney
Who: FOX*
Map: Valley
Organiser: Fuzz
Cap'n: HP or Chuck (first t' put han' up – Blood unavailable)
Where: 144.140.154.119:31350
Password: All gamearena captains received it via email
Referee Requested: Nay
Status: Challenge accepted.
Availability
| Team IPX | Sunday 9:00pm | Comment |
|---|
| CombatChuck | Aye | - | ||
| HP | Aye | - | ||
| Robag | Aye | What th' Fox:) | ||
| Johnny | Aye | Don’t mind sittin' out t' give others a go. :) | ||
| n0mad | Aye | Happy t' Sub/I will be thar | ||
| Hashy | Aye | Sub if needed, still possible client instabilities. | ||
| Ltmon | Maybe | - | ||
| Bloodstorm | Nay | will insert witty comment at some stage | ||
| chipper | Nay | away, should be back monday; fox hat | ||
| Fuzz | Nay | - | ||
Comments
Next Prac I'll be the Bot
Happy t0 Sub t' let a few 0f th' new guys get a game…
n0mad
A bot with a bazooka
Fox website
Hmm… can anyone read this?
http://etqw2ch.blog21.fc2.com/
Shoulda made it for 8:08pm
Shoulda made it fer 8:08pm =p
I belive
I believe Robag an' Chuck should have 1st dibs on bein' in th' team!
I played last game, an' performed poorly. Suggest someone else plays instead o' me
Availability
If it were bein' me, I’d be pickin' Robag, n0mad, Chipper, Ltmon, Hashy an' Chuck based on practice attendance. I’ll leave that t' th' captains though.
And as usual, I’m always happy t' sit on th' bench.
Can we all still make sure we fill out our availability. If ye be available but want t' sit on th' bench please just put yes, an' say bench stuff in th' comments. The available columns should just be yes’s or no’s, with anythin' more than that fittin' into th' comment column.
Thanks
I take it that they are not an Australian Clan?
Are they any good, has any one played them before?
They're extreme.
Base on them takin' on Angry Penguins.
I have t' say, they’re really good.
Challenge accepted
Still waitin' on some players fillin' in their availability.
Team we have
We can go with th' team we currently have listed in th' availability atm. would be nice if we got th' full cut o' every ones availability but as long as we have 6 players available t' start with we be ok.
Your right we can. Was
Your right we can, feed the fishes Was hopin' like ye that at least everyone would put in their availability.
Walk ya though it
Hashy,
Installer Didn’t Work :(
Manual Installation Didn’t Work :(
Happy t' help on Sunday night t' walk U through th' installation o'
pr0 m0d 0.6A
n0w be we playin Sunday 0n 0.6A be we n0t ?
n0mad
0.7 should be here s00n :)
I believe it’s 0.6a yes.
I believe it’s 0.6a yes. Ahoy, Get out of me rum!
http://www.gamearena.com.au/forums/3323/thread.php/4750353
Sorry but
sorry i didnt put mine in, i forgot t' do so when i commented on Robag an' chuck. me mistake.
anywho… i would nt be available, All Hands Hoay, yo ho, ho i fly t' Taswegia on saturday night an' dern't return untill th' followin' friday!
no trainin', no interwebs, no pajrono (gotta keep th' prioritys right).
But ill be IPXin' it up with me IPX colour shooze all across th' twoheaded country! (yes country)
Bad luck guys. Hope everone
Bad luck guys, me Jolly Roger Hope everone had fun.
Yup.
Had fun :D I found out that our weakness is vehicles.
That hack objective held us
That hack objective held us up twice… i’m not sure we had enough o' a plan fer it.
We ceratinly didn't
Takin' down a cyclops with only one rocket launcher sucks, I'll warrant ye. If we don’t have a better handle on th' titan an' other counter measures we be goin' t' keep bein' screwed by it.
Demos
Sounds like a fun game. Could we please upload our demos? I’d love t' see them (an' I’m sure some o' th' others would too).
For Sure
We spoke about it briefly on IRC after th' match, not sure if any one created a drop box fer them?
I suggest we add a little bit o' structure t' th' reviews, is thar some where private that we can post feedback fer each other in th' team? It would be good if we each reviewed one other players demo an' provide th' feedback, that way we can really get a whole closed loop process goin'.
If you want to discuss
If ye want t' discuss anythin' private just click th' access control tab on wherever u want t' talk about it (assume th' most logical place would be th' challenge page itself) an' set th' appropriate view privileges (usual disclaimer fer 1 applies). Note some content types don’t have access control, eg polls, so don’t try an' do it thar. If ye need t' discuss anythin' that needs more security than that, no we don’t have that.
If anyone doesn’t have access t' do that, let me know an' I can tweak th' th' general permissions t' allow it fer challenges.
Dunno. I know I didn’t. Only takes a second fer anyone t' do.
an0ther 0pti0n
Drop Io does allow fer comments when ye click each o' th' Demo’s but I think it would be safer t' have our comments on a singular page maybe a new page called IPX Demo Comments therefore all suggestions would be on 1 page.
Also big thanx t0 ltmon fer his sub work
all0wed fer me t' play an0ther Match…..
My Dem0’s uploaded, Look fer me excellent Grenade work :)
n0mad
yeah but I can’t see
aye but I can’t see anyone thinkin' t' go thar after they’ve uploaded their demo t' actually see what others have said. That’s just me though.
Perhaps we should use a forum post for once? ;-)
Dono but maybe that is th' place, after each match, post a new topic with th' name, setup a drop point an' then chuck th' feedback in one place?
Can we secure forum posts th' same way?
Switch em around, and you
Switch em aroun', an' ye got yourself a deal!!!!
we could, but is there a
we could, but is thar a reason why we wouldn’t just keep it on th' same page as th' challenge itself? We’d have 3 completely separate pages fer a single game that someone would need t' create – th' challenge itself, th' 3 stars poll, an' a discussion about tactics fer that game.
Dunno just seems like more work that won’t get done.
And yep can secure forum posts th' same as challenges. The other option would be t' create a content type “challenge tactics” an' set th' permissions on that t' be “secure” by default. Nay real advantage t' this as ye’ve still got 3 pages fer one challenge.
Good point
On th' challenge page should be sweet & I guess it’s more appropriate since th' feedback will relate t' a demo, which will relate t' a match, Ya swabbie! So th' Entity Relationship Diagram is satisfied an' no recursive joins required ;-)
Post new comment