The revisions let you track differences between multiple versions of a post.
Revision of IPX vs FOX - GA Season 2 Match 7 from Wed, 06/08/2008 - 14:01
10/08/2008 21:00
10/08/2008 23:30
Australia/Sydney
Who: FOX*
Date & Time: Sunday 10th August /Monday 11th August /Tuesday 12th August
Map: Volcano/Ark/Valley
Organiser: Fuzz
Captain: HP, Blood, or Chuck (first to put hand up)
Where: TBA
Password: TBA
Referee Requested: No
Status: Challenge submitted. Awaiting Fox to respond picking a time and a map (don’t bother picking maps in your comments below, it’s up to Fox).
Response deadline: 8th August, 11:30am.
Availability
| Team IPX | Sunday 9:00pm | Monday 7:30pm | Tuesday 8:00pm | Comment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fuzz | No | Yes | Yes | - | ||||||
| CombatChuck | Yes | No | Yes | - | ||||||
| HP | Yes | Yes | Yes | - |
Comments
Next Prac I'll be the Bot
Happy t0 Sub to let a few 0f the new guys get a game…
n0mad
A bot with a bazooka
Fox website
Hmm… can anyone read this?
http://etqw2ch.blog21.fc2.com/
Shoulda made it for 8:08pm
Shoulda made it for 8:08pm =p
I belive
I believe Robag and Chuck should have 1st dibs on being in the team!
I played last game, and performed poorly. Suggest someone else plays instead of me
Availability
If it was me, I’d be picking Robag, n0mad, Chipper, Ltmon, Hashy and Chuck based on practice attendance. I’ll leave that to the captains though.
And as usual, I’m always happy to sit on the bench.
Can we all still make sure we fill out our availability. If you are available but want to sit on the bench please just put yes, and say bench stuff in the comments. The available columns should just be yes’s or no’s, with anything more than that fitting into the comment column.
Thanks
I take it that they are not an Australian Clan?
Are they any good, has any one played them before?
They're extreme.
Base on them taking on Angry Penguins.
I have to say, they’re really good.
Challenge accepted
Still waiting on some players filling in their availability.
Team we have
We can go with the team we currently have listed in the availability atm. would be nice if we got the full cut of every ones availability but as long as we have 6 players available to start with we are ok.
Your right we can. Was
Your right we can. Was hoping like you that at least everyone would put in their availability.
Walk ya though it
Hashy,
Installer Didn’t Work :(
Manual Installation Didn’t Work :(
Happy to help on Sunday night to walk U through the installation of
pr0 m0d 0.6A
n0w are we playin Sunday 0n 0.6A are we n0t ?
n0mad
0.7 should be here s00n :)
I believe it’s 0.6a yes.
I believe it’s 0.6a yes.
http://www.gamearena.com.au/forums/3323/thread.php/4750353
Sorry but
sorry i didnt put mine in, i forgot to do so when i commented on Robag and chuck. my mistake.
anywho… i would nt be available. i fly to Taswegia on saturday night and do not return untill the following friday!
no training, no interwebs, no pajrono (gotta keep the prioritys right).
But ill be IPXing it up with my IPX colour shooze all across the twoheaded country! (yes country)
Bad luck guys. Hope everone
Bad luck guys. Hope everone had fun.
Yup.
Had fun :D I found out that our weakness is vehicles.
That hack objective held us
That hack objective held us up twice… i’m not sure we had enough of a plan for it.
We ceratinly didn't
Taking down a cyclops with only one rocket launcher sucks. If we don’t have a better handle on the titan and other counter measures we are going to keep being screwed by it.
Demos
Sounds like a fun game. Could we please upload our demos? I’d love to see them (and I’m sure some of the others would too).
For Sure
We spoke about it briefly on IRC after the match, not sure if any one created a drop box for them?
I suggest we add a little bit of structure to the reviews, is there some where private that we can post feedback for each other in the team? It would be good if we each reviewed one other players demo and provide the feedback, that way we can really get a whole closed loop process going.
If you want to discuss
If you want to discuss anything private just click the access control tab on wherever u want to talk about it (assume the most logical place would be the challenge page itself) and set the appropriate view privileges (usual disclaimer for 1 applies). Note some content types don’t have access control, eg polls, so don’t try and do it there. If you need to discuss anything that needs more security than that, no we don’t have that.
If anyone doesn’t have access to do that, let me know and I can tweak the the general permissions to allow it for challenges.
Dunno. I know I didn’t. Only takes a second for anyone to do.
an0ther 0pti0n
Drop Io does allow for comments when you click each of the Demo’s but I think it would be safer to have our comments on a singular page maybe a new page called IPX Demo Comments therefore all suggestions would be on 1 page.
Also big thanx t0 ltmon for his sub work
all0wed for me to play an0ther Match…..
My Dem0’s uploaded, Look for my excellent Grenade work :)
n0mad
yeah but I can’t see
yeah but I can’t see anyone thinking to go there after they’ve uploaded their demo to actually see what others have said. That’s just me though.
Perhaps we should use a forum post for once? ;-)
Dono but maybe that is the place, after each match, post a new topic with the name, setup a drop point and then chuck the feedback in one place?
Can we secure forum posts the same way?
Switch em around, and you
Switch em around, and you got yourself a deal!!!!
we could, but is there a
we could, but is there a reason why we wouldn’t just keep it on the same page as the challenge itself? We’d have 3 completely separate pages for a single game that someone would need to create – the challenge itself, the 3 stars poll, and a discussion about tactics for that game.
Dunno just seems like more work that won’t get done.
And yep can secure forum posts the same as challenges. The other option would be to create a content type “challenge tactics” and set the permissions on that to be “secure” by default. No real advantage to this as you’ve still got 3 pages for one challenge.
Good point
On the challenge page should be sweet & I guess it’s more appropriate since the feedback will relate to a demo, which will relate to a match. So the Entity Relationship Diagram is satisfied and no recursive joins required ;-)
Post new comment